Expression #1 of SELECT list is not in GROUP BY clause and contains nonaggregated column 'n.id' which is not functionally dependent on columns in GROUP BY clause; this is incompatible with sql_mode=only_full_group_by
Expression #1 of SELECT list is not in GROUP BY clause and contains nonaggregated column 'n.id' which is not functionally dependent on columns in GROUP BY clause; this is incompatible with sql_mode=only_full_group_by NEW hm-INDEX TO EVALUATE THE SCIENTIFIC OUTPUT OF RESEARCHERS (azerb.) - Problems of Information Technology, scientific -practical journal
AZERBAIJAN NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
NEW hm-INDEX TO EVALUATE THE SCIENTIFIC OUTPUT OF RESEARCHERS (azerb.)
Aliguliyev R.M., Hasanova R.Sh.

Indices for evaluation of scientific autput of the researcher are divided into two groups: quantative indices and qualitative indices. The first group of indices reflects the productivity of a researcher and inform about the number of published articles. The second group of indices depict the influence of the papers in the h-core. In this paper, a new hm-index reflecting productivity of a researcher and holding both properties of h and m indices is proposed. (p. 68-73)

Keywords: h-index, m-index, g-index, hg-index, g2-index, hm-index.
References
  • Wu Q. The w-index: a significant improvement of the h-index // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, v.61, no.3, 609-614. 
  • Chun Z. -T. Relationship of the h-index, g-index, and e-index // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, v.61, no.3,  625-628.
  • Hirsch J.E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2005, v.102, no.46, pp.16569-16572.
  • Burrell Q.L. On the h-index, the size of the Hirsch core and Jin’s A-index // Journal of Informetrics, 2007, v.1, no.2, pp.170-177.
  • Rousseau R. New developments related to the Hirsch index // Industrial Sciences and Technology, 2006, v.1, no.4, pp. 23-25.
  • Bornmann Q.L., Mutz R., and Daniel H.D. Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h-index using data from biomedicine // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, v.59, no.5, pp.830-837.
  • Cabrerizo F.J., Alonso S., Herrera-Viedma E. and Herrera F. q2-index: quantitative and qualitative evaluation based on the number and impact of papers in the Hirsch core // Journal of Informetrics, 2010, v.4, no.1, pp.23-28.
  • Egghe L. Theory and practice of the g-index // Scientometrics, 2006, v.69, no.1, pp.131-152.
  • Alonso S., Cabrerizo F.J., Herrera-Viedma E. and Herrera F. hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices // Scientometrics, 2010, v.82, no.2, pp.391-400.
  • Kosmulski M. A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index // ISSI Newsletter, 2006, v.2, no.3, pp.4-6.
  • Jin B., Liang L., Rousseau R. and Egghe L. The R- and AR-indices: complementing the h-index // Chinese Science Bulletin, 2007, v.52, no.6,  855-863.
  • Egghe L., Rousseau R. An h-index weighted by citation impact // Information Processing and Management, 2008, v.44, no.2, pp.770-780.
  • Jin B. h-Index: an evaluation indicator proposed by scientist // Science Focus, 2006, v.1, no.1, pp.8-9.
  • Egghe L. An improvement of the h-index: the g-index // ISSI Newsletter, 2006, v.2, no.1, pp.8-9.