AZERBAIJAN NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
THE CURRENT STATE, PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES OF E-GOVERNMENT ANALYSIS TECHNOLOGIES
Ramiz M. Aliguliyev, Gunay Y. Niftaliyeva

In this paper, e-government maturity models have been analyzed. The role of text mining and social network analysis technologies in e-government was investigated; the current state of research in this field has been analyzed. In the result of investigation, the existing problems and future research directions in this field have been identified (pp.53-63). 

Keywords: e-government, e-government models, text mining, social network analysis.
DOI : 10.25045/jpit.v08.i1.07
References
  • Bekkers V. J. J. M., Zouridis S. Electronic service delivery in public administration: some trends and issues //International Review of Administrative Sciences, 1999, vol.65, no.2, pp.183−196.
  • Carter L., Bélanger F. The Utilization of E-Government Services: Citizen Trust, Innovation and Acceptance Factors // Information Systems Journal, 2005, vol.15, no.1, pp.5–25.
  • Patel H., Jacobson D. Factors Influencing Citizen Adoption of E-Government: A Review and Critical Assessment / 16th European Conference on Information Systems, Galway, 2008, pp.176–188.
  • Schelin S. H. E-Government: An overview. Public Information Technology: Policy and Management Issues, 2003, pp.120−137.
  • Baum C., Di Maio A. Gartner’s four phases of e-government model. Gartner Group, 2000.
  • Deloitte Consulting, Deloitte & Touche. At the dawn of e-government: The citizen as customer. New York: Deloitte Research, 2000.
  • Layne K., Lee J. Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model // Government Information Quarterly, 2001, vol.18, no.2, pp.122−136.
  • Hiller J. S., Belanger F. Privacy strategies for electronic government. E-Government 2001, Rowman & Littlefiels publisher, pp.162–198.
  • Wescott C. G. E-Government in the Asia-pacific region // Asian Journal of Political Science, 2001, vol.9, no.2, pp.1–24.
  • United Nations & American Society for Public Administration (ASPA). Benchmarking e-government: A global perspective. New York: U.N. Publications, 2002.
  • Moon M. J. The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? // Public Administration Review, 2002, vol.62, no.4, pp.424–433.
  • Chandler S., Emanuels S. Transformation not automation / In Proceedings of 2nd European Conference on E-government, 2002, pp. 91–102.
  • Windley P. J. eGovernment maturity. USA: Windleys’ Technolometria, 2002. www.windley.com/docs/eGovernment%20Maturity.pdf
  • Toasaki Y. E-Government from A User’s Perspective. APEC telecommunication and information working group, Chinese Taipei, 2003.
  • Rohleder S. J., Jupp V. E-government Leadership: Engaging the customer. Accenture, 2003.
  • Siau K., Long Y. Synthesizing e-government stage models–a meta-synthesis based on metaethnography approach // Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2005, vol.105, no.4, pp.443–458.
  • Shahkooh K. A., Saghafi F., Abdollahi A. A proposed model for e-Government maturity /3rd International Conference on Information & Communication Technologies: from Theory to Applications, 2008, pp.1–5.
  • Almazan R. S., Gil-Garcia J. R. E-Government Portals in Mexico // Electronic Government: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications, 2008, pp.367–376.
  • Kim D.-Y., Grant G.E-government maturity model using the capability maturity model integration // Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 2010, vol.12, no.3, pp.230–244.
  • Alhomod S. M., Shafi M. M., Kousarrizi M. N., Seiti F., Teshnehlab M., Susanto H., Batawi Y. A. Best Practices in E government: A review of Some Innovative Models Proposed in Different Countries // International Journal of Electrical & Computer Sciences, 2012, vol.12, no.1, pp.1–6.
  • United-Nations. UN E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People, 2012.
  • Lee G., Kwak Y. H. An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement // Government Information Quarterly, 2012, vol.29, no.4, pp.492–503.
  • Cardeñosa J., Gallardo C., Moreno J.M. Text Mining Techniques to Support e-Democracy Systems / In: CSREA EE 2009, pp.401–405.
  • Rao G. K., Dey S. Text Mining Based Decision Support System (TMbDSS) for E-governance: A Roadmap for India // Advances in Computing and Information Technology, 2011, vol.198, pp.270–281.
  • Linders D. From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media // Government Information Quarterly, 2012, vol.29, no.4, pp.446–454.
  • Song W., Kim J. Y., Schulzrinne H., Boni P., Armstrong M. Using IM and SMS for emergency text communications / Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Principles, Systems and Applications of IP Telecommunications, 2009, pp.1–4.
  • Ku Ch.-H., Leroy G. A decision support system: Automated crime report analysis and classification for e-government // Government Information Quarterly, 2014, vol.31, no.4, pp.534–544.
  • Wang S., Zhang J., Yang F., Ye J. Research on Cluster Analysis Method of E-government Public Hotspot Information Based on Web Log Analysis // Computing and Information Technology, 2013, vol.22, pp.11–19.
  • Mostafa M. M., El-Masry A. A. Citizens as consumers: Profiling e-government services’ users in Egypt via data mining techniques // International Journal of Information Management, 2013, vol.33, no.4, pp.627–641.
  • Tilahun T., Sharma D.P. Design and Development of E-Governance Model for Service Quality Enhancement // Journal of Data Analysis and Information Processing, 2015, vol.3, no.3, pp.55–62.
  • Stylios G., Christodoulakis D., Besharat J., Vonitsanou M.-A., Kotrotsos I., Koumpouri A., Stamou S. Public Opinion Mining for Governmental Decisions // Electronic Journal of e-Government, 2010, vol.8, no.2, pp.203–214.
  • Jovanovska M. B., Erman N., Todorovski L. Evaluating the Maturity Level of e-Government Back-Office with Social Network Analysis / 20th NISPAcee Annual Conference. Public Administration East and West: Twenty Years of Development. Ohrid, Macedonia, 2012.
  • Petricek V., Escher T., Cox I. J., Margetts H. The Web Structure of E-Government -Developing a Methodology for Quantitative Evaluation / International World Wide Web Conference Committee, 2006, pp.669–678.
  • Kadriu A., Saveska M., Abazi-Bexheti L. E-Government Exploration using Social Network Analysis Methods // International Journal of Humanities and Management Sciences, 2013, vol.1, no.2, pp.151–154.
  • uberlink.com/
  • http://nodexl.codeplex.com/
  • Hood C. The Tools of Government (London: Macmillan), 1983.
  • Hood C., Margetts H. The Tools of Government in the Digital Age (London: Palgrave), 2006.
  • Escher T., Margetts H., Petricek V., CoxI. Governing from the Centre? Comparing the Nodality of Digital Governments // Prepared for delivery at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science.
  • Halpern D., Katz J. E. From e-government to Social Network Government: Towards a Transition Model / Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, 2012, pp.119–127.
  • Khan G. F., Park H. W. The e-government research domain: A triple helix network analysis of collaboration at the regional, country, and institutional levels // Government Information Quarterly, 2013, vol.30, no.2, pp.182–193.
  • Chutimaskul W. e-Government Analysis and Modeling / 3rd International Workshop on "Knowledge Management in e -Government", 2002, vol.7, pp.112–123.