№1, 2025
PRINCIPLES OF ETHICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Terms such as algorithms, data, and artificial intelligence (AI) are becoming part of our daily lives. Undoubtedly, they are widely talked about and promise a more successful future. But what risks can losing control over their development pose? In order to respond to the challenges of accountability in the development of AI, many government agencies, private enterprises, and international organizations have published charters of practice, declarations of principles, and recommendations in this direction. They have demonstrated convergence around basic principles. However, principles are sometimes abstract and are not always defined in the same way all over the world. Much work remains to be done in this area. We need to think about the implementation of general ethical principles, ensure that they can be applied to each area of specific activity (education, science, healthcare, etc.), and the proposals arising from this thinking should be implemented in practice. It is important to involve citizens more in defining guidelines for the responsible use of AI and big data and to collect their informed opinions. Indeed, the application of artificial intelligence affects everyone and raises ethical and political questions that are the subject of public debate (pp.47-52).
- Anderson, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2007). Ethics for synthetic beings. AI & Society, 22(3), 313-323. www.doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0146-3
- Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014). The ethics of artificial intelligence. In The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 316-334). Cambridge University Press. www.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139046855.020
- Brundage, M. (2014). Limitations and risks of machine ethics. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 26(3), 355-372. www.doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2014.895111
- Bryson, J. J. (2018). Patiency is not a virtue: The design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(1), 15-26. www.doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9448-6
- Calo, R. (2017). Artificial intelligence policy: A primer and roadmap. UC Davis Law Review, 51, 399-435. www.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3015350
- Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI ethics. MIT Press. www.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12230.001.0001
- Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). www.doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
- Gunkel, D. J. (2012). The machine question: Critical perspectives on AI, robots, and ethics. MIT Press. www.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262017435.001.0001
- Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389-399. www.doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
- Lin, P., Abney, K., & Bekey, G. A. (2011). Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics. MIT Press. www.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262526005.001.0001
- Moor, J. H. (2006). The nature, importance, and difficulty of machine ethics. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(4), 18-21. www.doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.80
- Müller, V. C. (2020). Ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. www.doi.org/10.5840/stanford/202032445
- Russell, S., Dewey, D., & Tegmark, M. (2015). Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 36(4), 105-114. www.doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v36i4.2577
- Sharkey, A. J. C., & Sharkey, N. E. (2010). Granny and the robots: Ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(1), 27-40. www.doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6
- Siau, K., & Wang, W. (2018). Building trust in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robotics. ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality, 11(4), 1-9. www.doi.org/10.1145/3236006
- Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Knopf. www.doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05868-2
- Turilli, M., & Floridi, L. (2009). The ethics of information transparency. Ethics and Information Technology, 11(2), 105-112. www.doi.org/10.1007/s10676-009-9187-9
- Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. Oxford University Press. www.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190498511.001.0001
- Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2008). Moral machines: Teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press. www.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374049.001.0001
- Winfield, A. F. T., & Jirotka, M. (2018). Ethical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), 20180085. www.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0085
- Yampolskiy, R. V. (2013). Artificial intelligence safety engineering: Why machine ethics is a wrong approach. In Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 389-396). Springer. www.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31674-6_28
- Zeng, Y., Lu, E., & Huangfu, C. (2018). Linking artificial intelligence principles. www.doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2018.00138