№2, 2020

APPROACHES TO THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE “ETHNOBOTANICAL” INFORMATION SYSTEM

Laman F. Hamidova

The article explores international experience in the field of ethnobotany information systems. It analyzes existing approaches to the architecture of the ethnobotany information system. The proposed ethnobotany information system includes botanical characteristics of plants, usage forms, chemical composition, photos, name of plants in several languages, and visual representation of vegetation distribution range on the map. Based on the existing experience, recommendations are made on the architecture of the ethnobotany information system. An information system is established to store and process the plants in a unique database. For this purpose, the components of the information system are analyzed and their interoperability principle is graded. The role of complex data standards in the set of ethnobotany databases, their analysis, problems and solution methods to the formation of information systems are studied. The server used for the ethnobotany database, the interrelationship of the information presented here are analyzed and their conceptual architectural basis is developed (pp.134-144).

Keywords: ethnobotany, information systems, complex information standards, SQL server, database, table-type data used in database.
References
  • Eldeen I.M.S., Effendy M.A.W., Tengku-Muhammad T.S. Ethnobotany:Challenges and Future Perspectives // Research Journal of Medicinal Plants, 2016, no.10, pp.382-387. DOI:3923/rjmp.2016.382.387.
  • Simmonds M.S.J. Opportunities and Challenges for Ethnobotany at the Start of the Twenty-First Century, 2009, USA, pp.127–140.
  • Chavan V., Krishnan S. Biodiversity Information in India: Challenges andPotentials//In: J. Shimura. Joint international forum on biodiversity information,building capacity in Asia and Oceania // National Institute for Environmental Studies.Tsukuba, Japan, 2003, pp. 114–120.
  • WHO//WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy: 2014-2023.World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013, pp.76.
  • AMED (Allied and Complimentary Medicine Database). www.bl.uk/services/information/amed.html
  • Ethnoecology Database of the Greater Southwest. fortlewis.edu/ethnobotany/database.htm
  • www.pharm.uu.nl/home/smit/
  • CHIMERA, www.rosenthal.hs.columbia.edu/databases/TradMed_CMMRC.html
  • Beijing Database of Traditional Chinese Medicine. www.rosenthal.hs.columbia.edu/databases/TradMed_Beijing.html
  • American Folk Medicine, www.folkmed.ucla.edu/index.html
  • www.gbif.org/
  • Rainforest Tropical Plant Database. www.rain-tree.com/plants.htm
  • IOPİ. iopi.csu.edu.au/iopi/
  • Plants For A Future.www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/pfaf/
  • www.rosenthal.hs.columbia.edu/databases/TradMed_INMEDPLAN.html
  • Mehdiyeva N. Importance database of medicinal plants for plant biodiversity conservation in Azerbaijan // International conference, Environmental changes conservation of plant diversity, 2013.
  • Peterson A.T., Vieglais D.A., Sigenza A.G. N., Silva M. A global distributed biodiversity information network: building the world museum// III Global Biodiversity Information Facility, Denmark, 2003, pp.186–196.
  • Intergovernmental Committee. Technical Proposals on Databases and Registries of Traditional Knowledge and Biological / Genetic Resources. World Intellectual Property Organization Geneva, 2002. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_grtkf_ic_4/wipo_grtkf_ic_4_14.pdf
  • Thomas M.B. Emerging Synergies between Information Technology and Applied Ethnobotanical Research // A journal of Plants, People, and Applied Research, 2003, vol.1, pp.65–74.
  • Petković D. JSON Integration in Relational Database Systems // International Journal of Computer Applications, 2017, vol.168, no.5, pp. 14-19.