№1, 2019


Yadigar N. Imamverdiyev

Effective coordination of the activities of actors (state organizations, private sector, public organizations and citizens), which are engaged in the system of ensuring the information security of the e-government, is of decisive importance. The effectiveness of coordination directly depends on the timely and qualitative exchange of information between these actors. Therefore, by building the topological structure of the corresponding information flows and analyzing them, reengineering can be implemented and the efficiency of the coordination system can be improved. To this end, in this paper, the coordination system is decomposed into a hierarchical four-level structure for modeling the e-government coordination system, and a multi-agent network model is built for it. To assess the efficiency and effectiveness of the coordination system under consideration, using this network model, the hierarchy index, inertia index, and a number of other indicators are proposed (pp.47-58).

Keywords: e-government, information security, coordination, hierarchical structure, inertia index, coordination degree, social network analysis.
  • İmamverdiyev Y.N. E-dövlətin informasiya təhlükəsizliyi üzrə koordinasiya problemləri // İnformasiya cəmiyyəti problemləri, 2014, №2, s.24–30.
  • Tabansky L., Ben-Israel I. Cybersecurity in Israel. SpringerBriefs in Cybersecurity. Heidelberg: Springer Cham, 2015, 84 p.
  • Chua A., Kaynak S., Foo S. An analysis of the delayed response to hurricane Katrina through the lens of knowledge management // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, vol.58, no.3, pp.391–403.
  • Malone T., Crowston K. What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems?. / Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, 1990, pp.357–370.
  • Comfort L.K., Ko K., Zagorecki A. Coordination in rapidly evolving disaster response systems: the role of information // American Behavioral Scientist, 2004, vol.48, no.3, pp.295–313.
  • Омельченко А.В. Теория графов. М: МЦНМО, 2018, 416 с.
  • Wasserman S., and Faust K. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge university press, 1994, 857 p.
  • Holder L. B., Cook D.J. Mining Graph Data. Wiley, 2007.
  • Hocevar S., Jansen E., Thomas G. Building collaborative capacity for homeland security. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2004.
  • Cybersecurity: Progress Made but Challenges Remain in Defining and Coordinating the Comprehensive National Initiative. United States Government Accountability Office. March 2010.
  • Adam N., Kozanoglu A., Paliwal A., Shafiq B. Secure Information Sharing in a Virtual Multi-Agency Team Environment // Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 2007, vol.179, pp.97–109.
  • Skopik F., Settanni G., Fiedler R. A problem shared is a problem halved: A survey on the dimensions of collective cyber defense through security information sharing // Computers & Security, 2016, vol 60, pp.154–176.
  • Kapucu N. Interorganizational coordination in dynamic context: Networks in emergency response management // Connections, 2005, vol.26, no.2, pp.33–48.
  • Abbasi A., Sadeghi-Niaraki A., Jalili M., & Choi S.M. Enhancing response coordination through the assessment of response network structural dynamics // PloS One, vol.13, no.2, e0191130.
  • Rimstad, Njå O., Rake E., Braut G.S. Incident command and information flows in a large-scale emergency operation // Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2014, vol.22, no.1, pp.29–38.
  • Uhr C. Multi-organizational emergency response management – A framework for further development: Doctoral thesis. Lund University, 2009, 254 p.
  • Hossain L., Wu A., and Chung K. K. Actor centrality correlates to project based coordination / Proceedings of the 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pp. 363–372.
  • Kiesling S., Klünder J., Fischer D., Schneider K., Fischbach K. Applying social network analysis and centrality measures to improve information flow analysis / International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, 2016, pp.379–386.
  • Hossain L. Communications and coordination in construction projects // Construction Management and Economics, 2009, vol.27, no.1, pp.25–39.
  • Dogan S. Z., Arditi D., Gunhan S., Erbasaranoglu B. Assessing coordination performance based on centrality in an e-mail communication network // Journal of Management in Engineering, 2013, vol.31, no.3, 04014047. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000255.
  • Hossain L., Kuti M. Disaster response preparedness coordination through social networks // Disasters, vol.34, no.3, pp.755–786.
  • Uddin M. S., Hossain L. Towards coordination preparedness of soft-target organisation / International Conference on Electronic Government, 2009, pp.54–64.
  • Bdeir F. Networks of inter-organisational coordination during disease outbreaks. PhD thesis. The University of Sydney, 2014, 350 p.
  • Ляшенко Е.Н., Шерстюк В.Г. Разработка модели координации сил и средств в иерархической системе гражданской защиты населения // Технологический аудит и резервы производства, 2015, т.4, №2, с.4–10.
  • Имамвердиев Я.Н. Создание CERT-команды для научной компьютерной сети AzScienceNet // Проблемы информационного общества, 2011, №1, c.15–26.
  • Əliquliyev R. M., İmamverdiyev Y. N. İnformasiya təhlükəsizliyi insidentləri. Bakı: İnformasiya Texnologiyaları, 2012, 212 s.
  • Bigley G. The incident command system: high-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments // Academy of Management Journal, 2001, vol. 44, no.6, pp.1281–1299.
  • Krackhardt D. Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations // Computational organization theory, 1994, pp.89–111.
  • Richard J. P. Time-delay systems: an overview of some recent advances and open problems // Automatica, 2003, vol.39, no.10, pp.1667–1694.